https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419885 A challenge to an order releasing non-relied upon seized documents was rejected because the authority had acted in compliance with earlier writ directions, and the court would not interfere with the authority's discretion to decide which seized documents should be relied on or retained for investigation. Fresh grievances based on facts and allegations already in existence when the earlier petitions were filed could not be raised again in a third petition, as the claim was barred by Order 2 Rule 2 CPC and constructive res judicata. The writ petition was dismissed. en-us Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:37:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419885 A challenge to an order releasing non-relied upon seized documents was rejected because the authority had acted in compliance with earlier writ directions, and the court would not interfere with the authority's discretion to decide which seized documents should be relied on or retained for investigation. Fresh grievances based on facts and allegations already in existence when the earlier petitions were filed could not be raised again in a third petition, as the claim was barred by Order 2 Rule 2 CPC and constructive res judicata. The writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419885