https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419883 The note states that restoration of a previously dismissed stay application, and a fresh stay on valuation and duty collection pending appeal, was not warranted after the appellant had earlier said the stay request was not being pressed and early hearing had been allowed. It explains that the proper course in those circumstances was expeditious disposal of the appeal rather than revival of the stay plea. On that reasoning, the request for restoration and interim stay was rejected, and the stay application was dismissed. en-us Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:36:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419883 The note states that restoration of a previously dismissed stay application, and a fresh stay on valuation and duty collection pending appeal, was not warranted after the appellant had earlier said the stay request was not being pressed and early hearing had been allowed. It explains that the proper course in those circumstances was expeditious disposal of the appeal rather than revival of the stay plea. On that reasoning, the request for restoration and interim stay was rejected, and the stay application was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419883