<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 921 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419883</link>
    <description>Restoration of a stay application was unavailable where it had earlier been dismissed as infructuous after the appellant did not press it upon obtaining early hearing. A request to stay valuation and duty collection on goods cleared pending appeal could not be granted in those circumstances. Expeditious disposal of the appeal, already listed for early hearing, remained the appropriate remedy. The request for restoration and stay was rejected, and the stay application stood dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 08:36:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 921 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419883</link>
      <description>Restoration of a stay application was unavailable where it had earlier been dismissed as infructuous after the appellant did not press it upon obtaining early hearing. A request to stay valuation and duty collection on goods cleared pending appeal could not be granted in those circumstances. Expeditious disposal of the appeal, already listed for early hearing, remained the appropriate remedy. The request for restoration and stay was rejected, and the stay application stood dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>