<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 23 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28357</link>
    <description>A prosecution for alleged false statements in an income-tax return and affidavit was unsustainable where the materials did not show a knowingly false claim, but only a disputed claim to exemption under section 54. The Court held that a mistaken or over-extended exemption claim is not, by itself, false verification or false evidence, and the affidavit on residence was not false on the construction applied. It further held that the complaint was premature because assessment had not run its course and no fair opportunity of explanation was given before prosecution. Continuation of the proceedings after assessment under the voluntary disclosure scheme was treated as oppressive and an abuse of process, so the complaint and connected proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 23 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28357</link>
      <description>A prosecution for alleged false statements in an income-tax return and affidavit was unsustainable where the materials did not show a knowingly false claim, but only a disputed claim to exemption under section 54. The Court held that a mistaken or over-extended exemption claim is not, by itself, false verification or false evidence, and the affidavit on residence was not false on the construction applied. It further held that the complaint was premature because assessment had not run its course and no fair opportunity of explanation was given before prosecution. Continuation of the proceedings after assessment under the voluntary disclosure scheme was treated as oppressive and an abuse of process, so the complaint and connected proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>