<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 19 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28354</link>
    <description>The High Court of Patna ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the cancellation of the penalty imposed was legal and proper. The court agreed with the Tribunal that the burden was on the Department to establish that the cash credits constituted income, and since the assessee failed to prove the credits as genuine, no penalty could be imposed. The court upheld the cancellation of the penalty, finding no infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s decision and awarding costs to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 19 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28354</link>
      <description>The High Court of Patna ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the cancellation of the penalty imposed was legal and proper. The court agreed with the Tribunal that the burden was on the Department to establish that the cash credits constituted income, and since the assessee failed to prove the credits as genuine, no penalty could be imposed. The court upheld the cancellation of the penalty, finding no infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s decision and awarding costs to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>