https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419877 The Tribunal found that the charge of clandestine removal against the appellant was not proven beyond doubt due to procedural lapses and lack of corroborative evidence. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, in accordance with the law. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to statutory procedures for admitting evidence and the necessity of corroborative evidence in cases involving clandestine removal. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419877 The Tribunal found that the charge of clandestine removal against the appellant was not proven beyond doubt due to procedural lapses and lack of corroborative evidence. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, in accordance with the law. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to statutory procedures for admitting evidence and the necessity of corroborative evidence in cases involving clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419877