https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419873 The court dismissed the Criminal Revision challenging the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner's appeal was based on the argument that the facts did not constitute an offense under Section 138. However, the court found that the petitioner's actions established a debt liability towards the respondent, aligning with legal obligations under the Act. Emphasizing precedents limiting revision jurisdiction in criminal matters, the court upheld the lower courts' decisions, citing relevant case law and finding no illegality in their judgments. en-us Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Mar 2022 10:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419873 The court dismissed the Criminal Revision challenging the conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner's appeal was based on the argument that the facts did not constitute an offense under Section 138. However, the court found that the petitioner's actions established a debt liability towards the respondent, aligning with legal obligations under the Act. Emphasizing precedents limiting revision jurisdiction in criminal matters, the court upheld the lower courts' decisions, citing relevant case law and finding no illegality in their judgments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419873