<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 902 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419864</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the deemed dividend should be taxed in the petitioner&#039;s hands due to substantial interest in the companies. The court found the Revenue&#039;s attempt to re-open the assessment invalid, as there was no fault on the petitioner&#039;s part in disclosing material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 902 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419864</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the deemed dividend should be taxed in the petitioner&#039;s hands due to substantial interest in the companies. The court found the Revenue&#039;s attempt to re-open the assessment invalid, as there was no fault on the petitioner&#039;s part in disclosing material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>