<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 900 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419862</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the penalty issue back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, considering the role of the Tax Consultant in the fraudulent activities and the assessee&#039;s lack of knowledge regarding the false claims made in the revised return. The appeal by the assessee was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the importance of fair assessment and due process in penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:00:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 900 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419862</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the penalty issue back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, considering the role of the Tax Consultant in the fraudulent activities and the assessee&#039;s lack of knowledge regarding the false claims made in the revised return. The appeal by the assessee was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the importance of fair assessment and due process in penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>