<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 878 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419840</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for the assessee to provide evidence supporting commission payments. The ITAT allowed the appeal on statistical grounds due to the lack of representation by the assessee, their willingness to provide evidence, and the failure of the CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:59:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 878 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419840</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for the assessee to provide evidence supporting commission payments. The ITAT allowed the appeal on statistical grounds due to the lack of representation by the assessee, their willingness to provide evidence, and the failure of the CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>