<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 861 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to grant registration to the Respondent. It concluded that the Respondent, as the rightful owner post liquidation, was entitled to registration for business activities on the acquired property. The judgment affirms the legality of registration post liquidation, emphasizing the new owner&#039;s rights over the property obtained through official channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 861 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to grant registration to the Respondent. It concluded that the Respondent, as the rightful owner post liquidation, was entitled to registration for business activities on the acquired property. The judgment affirms the legality of registration post liquidation, emphasizing the new owner&#039;s rights over the property obtained through official channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>