<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 860 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419822</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal and directed the appellant to pay a penalty of &amp;amp;8377;1,45,700 within three months. The appellant&#039;s willingness to pay the penalty without additional costs and the invocation of Rule 41 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules led to the decision to end the prolonged litigation, emphasizing the finality of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 08:58:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 860 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419822</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal and directed the appellant to pay a penalty of &amp;amp;8377;1,45,700 within three months. The appellant&#039;s willingness to pay the penalty without additional costs and the invocation of Rule 41 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules led to the decision to end the prolonged litigation, emphasizing the finality of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>