<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1052 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301226</link>
    <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling&#039;s decision that the Appellant is not entitled to avail Input Tax Credit on the purchase of Paver Blocks. The Paver Blocks, once laid, were deemed immovable property, and the expenses on their purchase were considered part of the original construction, falling under the prohibition of Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1052 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301226</link>
      <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling&#039;s decision that the Appellant is not entitled to avail Input Tax Credit on the purchase of Paver Blocks. The Paver Blocks, once laid, were deemed immovable property, and the expenses on their purchase were considered part of the original construction, falling under the prohibition of Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>