<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 20 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28346</link>
    <description>The court held that no change in the firm&#039;s constitution occurred when a minor partner reached majority, as per the terms of the partnership deed. Consequently, the court did not address the issue of the assessment under section 144 and the grant of registration, as the resolution of the primary issue made the second question moot. The case was remanded to the Department for appropriate orders in accordance with the Income Tax Act, with costs awarded to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:09:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 20 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28346</link>
      <description>The court held that no change in the firm&#039;s constitution occurred when a minor partner reached majority, as per the terms of the partnership deed. Consequently, the court did not address the issue of the assessment under section 144 and the grant of registration, as the resolution of the primary issue made the second question moot. The case was remanded to the Department for appropriate orders in accordance with the Income Tax Act, with costs awarded to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>