<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 702 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the pre-conditions for triggering Regulation 11(1) were not met as the appellant had no prior shareholding in the company and there was no evidence of concerted action in earlier acquisitions. The penalty imposed by SEBI was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 17:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 702 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the pre-conditions for triggering Regulation 11(1) were not met as the appellant had no prior shareholding in the company and there was no evidence of concerted action in earlier acquisitions. The penalty imposed by SEBI was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>