<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 802 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, permitting the claim for the addition under section 40(a)(ia) and excise duty refund. However, the claims regarding interest income from FDRs and transport subsidy were dismissed. The Tribunal relied on relevant court decisions to support its findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 13:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 802 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, permitting the claim for the addition under section 40(a)(ia) and excise duty refund. However, the claims regarding interest income from FDRs and transport subsidy were dismissed. The Tribunal relied on relevant court decisions to support its findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>