<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Failure to Prove Bank Was Notified of Lost Cheque Book Upholds Conviction u/s 138.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62516</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - rebuttal of presumption - preponderance of probabilities - There is no evidence to establish that the appellant had informed the Bank about the loss of the cheque book containing blank cheque. In fact, In the statement under Section 313 Cr.PC. appellant had stated that this cheque book containing a blank cheque was lost. Appellant has no case that the signature on the cheque in question was not put by him - in the totality of facts of this case the appellant has not established a case for interference with the finding of the Courts below that the offence under Section 138 N. I. Act stands committed by the appellant. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:22:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:22:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Failure to Prove Bank Was Notified of Lost Cheque Book Upholds Conviction u/s 138.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62516</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - rebuttal of presumption - preponderance of probabilities - There is no evidence to establish that the appellant had informed the Bank about the loss of the cheque book containing blank cheque. In fact, In the statement under Section 313 Cr.PC. appellant had stated that this cheque book containing a blank cheque was lost. Appellant has no case that the signature on the cheque in question was not put by him - in the totality of facts of this case the appellant has not established a case for interference with the finding of the Courts below that the offence under Section 138 N. I. Act stands committed by the appellant. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:22:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>