<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 848 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419810</link>
    <description>A Regional Rural Bank, treated as a cooperative society under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, was held entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act because the deeming provision and overriding effect of the earlier Act were not displaced by section 80P(4). The disallowance was therefore unsustainable. On penalty, a bona fide legal claim for deduction, without concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, did not attract section 271(1)(c); the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 848 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419810</link>
      <description>A Regional Rural Bank, treated as a cooperative society under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, was held entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act because the deeming provision and overriding effect of the earlier Act were not displaced by section 80P(4). The disallowance was therefore unsustainable. On penalty, a bona fide legal claim for deduction, without concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, did not attract section 271(1)(c); the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>