<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 831 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419793</link>
    <description>Share application money and share premium were added under section 68 because the assessee failed to prove the investor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of the transaction; the materials also indicated accommodation entries and a shell entity. Cash-based labour charges, loading and unloading expenses, missionary repair and maintenance expenses, part disallowance of vehicle, conveyance, festival, telephone, travelling and sales promotion es, and a portion of repair and maintenance expenses were sustained because the payments were inadequately vouched, unsupported by complete records, or not verified by log books and other material. The assessment additions and disallowances were upheld in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 831 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419793</link>
      <description>Share application money and share premium were added under section 68 because the assessee failed to prove the investor&#039;s identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of the transaction; the materials also indicated accommodation entries and a shell entity. Cash-based labour charges, loading and unloading expenses, missionary repair and maintenance expenses, part disallowance of vehicle, conveyance, festival, telephone, travelling and sales promotion es, and a portion of repair and maintenance expenses were sustained because the payments were inadequately vouched, unsupported by complete records, or not verified by log books and other material. The assessment additions and disallowances were upheld in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>