<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 830 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the agricultural land sold was not a capital asset under section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore not subject to capital gains tax. The Fair Market Value (FMV) determined by the Assessing Officer was deemed inapplicable as the land was not considered a capital asset. The Tribunal&#039;s decision led to the deletion of additions made by the AO, following the precedent set in the lead case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 830 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the agricultural land sold was not a capital asset under section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore not subject to capital gains tax. The Fair Market Value (FMV) determined by the Assessing Officer was deemed inapplicable as the land was not considered a capital asset. The Tribunal&#039;s decision led to the deletion of additions made by the AO, following the precedent set in the lead case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>