<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 796 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419758</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application filed by Union Bank of India under Section 95 of the IBC against the Personal Guarantor. It confirmed the validity of the service of Form B demand notice, initiating the interim moratorium. The appointment of the Resolution Professional was also confirmed, with directions to proceed as per the IBC provisions. The matter was listed for further hearing on 01.03.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:11:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 796 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419758</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application filed by Union Bank of India under Section 95 of the IBC against the Personal Guarantor. It confirmed the validity of the service of Form B demand notice, initiating the interim moratorium. The appointment of the Resolution Professional was also confirmed, with directions to proceed as per the IBC provisions. The matter was listed for further hearing on 01.03.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>