https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419754 The court dismissed the application challenging the demand-cum-show cause notice and Statements of Demand for financial years 2016-17 and 2017-18, citing that no interim order was necessary as the notices were related to July 2018 and August 2019. The petitioner's argument of the respondent's failure to conduct pre-show cause consultation for demands exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs was not upheld, leading to the dismissal of the application. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Mar 2022 07:37:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419754 The court dismissed the application challenging the demand-cum-show cause notice and Statements of Demand for financial years 2016-17 and 2017-18, citing that no interim order was necessary as the notices were related to July 2018 and August 2019. The petitioner's argument of the respondent's failure to conduct pre-show cause consultation for demands exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs was not upheld, leading to the dismissal of the application. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419754