<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 774 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions for unsecured loans and partners&#039; capital contributions under Section 68, as the assessee had fulfilled its burden of proof. However, the Tribunal restored the AO&#039;s disallowance under Section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000, as exceptional circumstances were not proven. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal issuing the order on 16th March 2022 at Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 07:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 774 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions for unsecured loans and partners&#039; capital contributions under Section 68, as the assessee had fulfilled its burden of proof. However, the Tribunal restored the AO&#039;s disallowance under Section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000, as exceptional circumstances were not proven. The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal issuing the order on 16th March 2022 at Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>