<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 14 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28329</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras clarified the interpretation of Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ruling that the provision applies when a payment exceeding Rs. 2,500 is made in cash for business purposes, regardless of individual items on a bill. The Court rejected the Tribunal&#039;s approach of considering each expenditure item separately and upheld the disallowance of cash payments exceeding the threshold. The Department was awarded costs, including counsel fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 14 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28329</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras clarified the interpretation of Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ruling that the provision applies when a payment exceeding Rs. 2,500 is made in cash for business purposes, regardless of individual items on a bill. The Court rejected the Tribunal&#039;s approach of considering each expenditure item separately and upheld the disallowance of cash payments exceeding the threshold. The Department was awarded costs, including counsel fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>