<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 765 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) under Section 263, upholding the original assessment order by the Assessing Officer (A.O.). The Tribunal found that the A.O. had conducted proper enquiries and verifications, concluding that the Pr. CIT&#039;s reliance on incomplete and unverified data from NSEL was unjustified. As a result, the appeals filed by the assessees were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 765 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) under Section 263, upholding the original assessment order by the Assessing Officer (A.O.). The Tribunal found that the A.O. had conducted proper enquiries and verifications, concluding that the Pr. CIT&#039;s reliance on incomplete and unverified data from NSEL was unjustified. As a result, the appeals filed by the assessees were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>