<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 761 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax improperly exercised jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had conducted a detailed enquiry into the matter of long-term capital gains on the sale of shares and had taken a plausible view. The Tribunal concluded that the revisionary proceedings and order by the PCIT were quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 761 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax improperly exercised jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had conducted a detailed enquiry into the matter of long-term capital gains on the sale of shares and had taken a plausible view. The Tribunal concluded that the revisionary proceedings and order by the PCIT were quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>