<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 749 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419711</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions and quashed the Show Cause Notices issued over 11 years ago, emphasizing adherence to time limits under Section 11(A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court rejected the justification of transferring the notices to the Call Book category due to pending appeals, stating that the delayed adjudication was unreasonable and warranted quashing of the notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 749 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419711</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions and quashed the Show Cause Notices issued over 11 years ago, emphasizing adherence to time limits under Section 11(A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court rejected the justification of transferring the notices to the Call Book category due to pending appeals, stating that the delayed adjudication was unreasonable and warranted quashing of the notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>