<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Respondent Controls Prosecution Strategy in Cheque Dishonor Cases; Accused Can&#039;t Dictate Evidence u/s 91 CPC.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62503</link>
    <description>Dishonor of cheque - framing of charge or trial - section 91 of Cr.P.C. - It is for the respondent to decide that in what way he would like to prosecute his case. Petitioner-accused cannot direct or compel respondent complainant to either lead the evidence or submit proof, as per his own choice or wishes. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 07:35:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 07:35:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Respondent Controls Prosecution Strategy in Cheque Dishonor Cases; Accused Can&#039;t Dictate Evidence u/s 91 CPC.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62503</link>
      <description>Dishonor of cheque - framing of charge or trial - section 91 of Cr.P.C. - It is for the respondent to decide that in what way he would like to prosecute his case. Petitioner-accused cannot direct or compel respondent complainant to either lead the evidence or submit proof, as per his own choice or wishes. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 07:35:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>