<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 913 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301193</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court applied the parameters for curative petitions laid down in Rupa Ashok Hurra and found that the material placed before it did not satisfy those established tests. The petitions therefore did not disclose grounds warranting the extraordinary curative remedy, and were dismissed for failure to meet the threshold for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:05:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 913 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301193</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court applied the parameters for curative petitions laid down in Rupa Ashok Hurra and found that the material placed before it did not satisfy those established tests. The petitions therefore did not disclose grounds warranting the extraordinary curative remedy, and were dismissed for failure to meet the threshold for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>