https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419695 The HC addressed a petition regarding delayed GST reimbursement to a contractor who completed awarded work. Despite government circulars indicating GST paid by contractors should be refunded, the petitioner waited years without disbursement. The court directed the first respondent to decide on the petitioner's representations within three months, evaluating eligibility based on approved bills and relevant government orders. If found eligible, amounts due must be promptly disbursed. The judgment emphasized case-specific evaluation rather than blanket directives to ensure fairness in GST reimbursement procedures. en-us Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419695 The HC addressed a petition regarding delayed GST reimbursement to a contractor who completed awarded work. Despite government circulars indicating GST paid by contractors should be refunded, the petitioner waited years without disbursement. The court directed the first respondent to decide on the petitioner's representations within three months, evaluating eligibility based on approved bills and relevant government orders. If found eligible, amounts due must be promptly disbursed. The judgment emphasized case-specific evaluation rather than blanket directives to ensure fairness in GST reimbursement procedures. Case-Laws GST Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419695