<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 731 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419693</link>
    <description>Blocking of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger remained open for administrative reconsideration after the petitioner withdrew the writ petition without prejudice. The Court permitted withdrawal while preserving the petitioner&#039;s legal grounds and statutory remedies, and noted that the pending representation for revocation of the blocked credit could still be pursued before the authority. The respondent&#039;s position was recorded that the representation would be considered in accordance with law. The petition was therefore dismissed as withdrawn, with the petitioner&#039;s remedy to seek revocation of the credit block left intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 731 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419693</link>
      <description>Blocking of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger remained open for administrative reconsideration after the petitioner withdrew the writ petition without prejudice. The Court permitted withdrawal while preserving the petitioner&#039;s legal grounds and statutory remedies, and noted that the pending representation for revocation of the blocked credit could still be pursued before the authority. The respondent&#039;s position was recorded that the representation would be considered in accordance with law. The petition was therefore dismissed as withdrawn, with the petitioner&#039;s remedy to seek revocation of the credit block left intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>