<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 728 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419690</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the jurisdictional condition to reopen the assessment was not met, and the exercise was deemed a change of opinion on the same material. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the notice dated 18th March 2021 and the order dated 3rd September 2021 were quashed and set aside, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 728 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419690</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the jurisdictional condition to reopen the assessment was not met, and the exercise was deemed a change of opinion on the same material. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the notice dated 18th March 2021 and the order dated 3rd September 2021 were quashed and set aside, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>