<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 715 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419677</link>
    <description>Contribution to an LIC-administered group gratuity scheme was treated as deductible where the insurer controlled the fund and gratuity was paid directly to eligible employees or their beneficiaries. The absence of formal approval of the gratuity fund did not defeat deduction because the employer retained no control over the irrevocable fund created exclusively for employees&#039; benefit. On that construction of section 36(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, the payment satisfied the statutory purpose and was allowable as a business deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 08:34:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 715 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419677</link>
      <description>Contribution to an LIC-administered group gratuity scheme was treated as deductible where the insurer controlled the fund and gratuity was paid directly to eligible employees or their beneficiaries. The absence of formal approval of the gratuity fund did not defeat deduction because the employer retained no control over the irrevocable fund created exclusively for employees&#039; benefit. On that construction of section 36(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, the payment satisfied the statutory purpose and was allowable as a business deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>