<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 708 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419670</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the AO regarding unexplained investment in a penny stock company, sale consideration of shares, and commission paid to an entry operator. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of incriminating material in assessments under section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ruling against the Revenue&#039;s appeal and in favor of the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 08:33:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 708 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419670</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the AO regarding unexplained investment in a penny stock company, sale consideration of shares, and commission paid to an entry operator. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of incriminating material in assessments under section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ruling against the Revenue&#039;s appeal and in favor of the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>