<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 707 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419669</link>
    <description>Recovery of drawback could not be sustained where the show cause notice remained unserved on the company and the adjudication proceeded without an effective opportunity to reply. The Court held that this violated natural justice, especially since the petitioner said it held records on inward remittance and export transactions that required consideration. The impugned order and the consequential recovery proceedings were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after giving the petitioner a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 08:33:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 707 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419669</link>
      <description>Recovery of drawback could not be sustained where the show cause notice remained unserved on the company and the adjudication proceeded without an effective opportunity to reply. The Court held that this violated natural justice, especially since the petitioner said it held records on inward remittance and export transactions that required consideration. The impugned order and the consequential recovery proceedings were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after giving the petitioner a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>