<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 701 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal, set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, and dismissed the Section 7 Application filed by the Financial Creditor. It held that there was no default by the Corporate Debtor on 01.08.2019, and the Bank&#039;s failure to refund the proportionate facility fee was deemed unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 08:33:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 701 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal, set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, and dismissed the Section 7 Application filed by the Financial Creditor. It held that there was no default by the Corporate Debtor on 01.08.2019, and the Bank&#039;s failure to refund the proportionate facility fee was deemed unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>