<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 14 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28316</link>
    <description>For assessment years prior to 1 April 1972, the expression &quot;jewellery&quot; in section 5(1)(viii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 did not include gold ornaments unless they were studded with precious or semi-precious stones. Applying the Full Bench view, the High Court held that plain gold ornaments fell outside the scope of the exemption-related term &quot;jewellery&quot; for that period, and the reference was answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:13:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 14 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28316</link>
      <description>For assessment years prior to 1 April 1972, the expression &quot;jewellery&quot; in section 5(1)(viii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 did not include gold ornaments unless they were studded with precious or semi-precious stones. Applying the Full Bench view, the High Court held that plain gold ornaments fell outside the scope of the exemption-related term &quot;jewellery&quot; for that period, and the reference was answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>