<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 691 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal in a case concerning a refund claim rejection related to excise duty calculation on motor vehicles. The appellant&#039;s practice of passing on reduced excise duty benefits to dealers through credit notes and cheques, resulting in reduced vehicle prices, was deemed valid. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim a refund of excess duty paid, without the need for provisional assessment or prior knowledge of duty rate reductions. The decision aligned with precedents and found no unjust enrichment, ultimately granting the appellant the entitlement to the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 691 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal in a case concerning a refund claim rejection related to excise duty calculation on motor vehicles. The appellant&#039;s practice of passing on reduced excise duty benefits to dealers through credit notes and cheques, resulting in reduced vehicle prices, was deemed valid. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to claim a refund of excess duty paid, without the need for provisional assessment or prior knowledge of duty rate reductions. The decision aligned with precedents and found no unjust enrichment, ultimately granting the appellant the entitlement to the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>