<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 17 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28314</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled against the assessee in a case involving the condonation of delay in making an application under section 146 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act were not applicable to applications under the Income-tax Act, as the latter contains specific provisions for condoning delays. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply section 5 of the Limitation Act was deemed incorrect, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:09:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 17 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28314</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled against the assessee in a case involving the condonation of delay in making an application under section 146 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act were not applicable to applications under the Income-tax Act, as the latter contains specific provisions for condoning delays. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply section 5 of the Limitation Act was deemed incorrect, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>