<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 132 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301178</link>
    <description>Prosecution evidence from eyewitnesses closely connected to prior criminal disputes was treated as partisan and unreliable, so their testimony had to be scrutinised with caution and was rejected. The failure to examine a material witness who was present at the occurrence, together with medical evidence inconsistent with the alleged manner of assault, created serious doubt about the prosecution version. In these circumstances, the prosecution did not prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the acquittal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 132 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301178</link>
      <description>Prosecution evidence from eyewitnesses closely connected to prior criminal disputes was treated as partisan and unreliable, so their testimony had to be scrutinised with caution and was rejected. The failure to examine a material witness who was present at the occurrence, together with medical evidence inconsistent with the alleged manner of assault, created serious doubt about the prosecution version. In these circumstances, the prosecution did not prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the acquittal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>