<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 688 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301176</link>
    <description>Interim relief in a public interest litigation must rest on a prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury, and should not practically grant final relief or cause irreversible prejudice. The Court recognised the power to preserve the subject matter and require documents, but held such protection must be fair and proportionate where parties have already altered their position under the existing regulatory regime. The interim orders were modified: appellants were allowed to complete transactions at an advanced stage, subject to adjustment against vacant land if the writ petition succeeded, while future permissions, constructions and third-party rights remained subject to law and further orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 12:43:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 688 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301176</link>
      <description>Interim relief in a public interest litigation must rest on a prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury, and should not practically grant final relief or cause irreversible prejudice. The Court recognised the power to preserve the subject matter and require documents, but held such protection must be fair and proportionate where parties have already altered their position under the existing regulatory regime. The interim orders were modified: appellants were allowed to complete transactions at an advanced stage, subject to adjustment against vacant land if the writ petition succeeded, while future permissions, constructions and third-party rights remained subject to law and further orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>