https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301175 Public interest litigation under Article 226 is intended to vindicate public duty and public interest, not to advance a private or collateral dispute. Where the petitioner lacks a real interest and places no reliable material to show illegality, mala fides, or public injury, writ jurisdiction should not be used to disturb a bona fide administrative decision. A party dispute may be referred to arbitration, and the mere choice of arbitration does not by itself indicate impropriety or bar judicial deference. On the stated facts, the challenge to the referral and award lacked material support and was outside proper limits of judicial review. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Mar 2022 12:37:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301175 Public interest litigation under Article 226 is intended to vindicate public duty and public interest, not to advance a private or collateral dispute. Where the petitioner lacks a real interest and places no reliable material to show illegality, mala fides, or public injury, writ jurisdiction should not be used to disturb a bona fide administrative decision. A party dispute may be referred to arbitration, and the mere choice of arbitration does not by itself indicate impropriety or bar judicial deference. On the stated facts, the challenge to the referral and award lacked material support and was outside proper limits of judicial review. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301175