https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419643 The HC disposed of a writ application under Article 226 challenging detention of goods in transit and seizure of conveyance during GST proceedings. Without examining merits, the court directed authorities to release the detained brass scrap goods and conveyance upon petitioner's deposit of Rs. 17,66,620 toward tax and penalty. The court allowed the GST MOV-10 inquiry to continue despite the release. Both parties agreed to this arrangement, with the petitioner (a proprietary concern from Maharashtra) having expressed willingness to make the deposit for immediate release of goods being transported to Gujarat. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419643 The HC disposed of a writ application under Article 226 challenging detention of goods in transit and seizure of conveyance during GST proceedings. Without examining merits, the court directed authorities to release the detained brass scrap goods and conveyance upon petitioner's deposit of Rs. 17,66,620 toward tax and penalty. The court allowed the GST MOV-10 inquiry to continue despite the release. Both parties agreed to this arrangement, with the petitioner (a proprietary concern from Maharashtra) having expressed willingness to make the deposit for immediate release of goods being transported to Gujarat. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419643