<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 680 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419642</link>
    <description>The High Court exercised inherent jurisdiction to secure an early decision on a pending application for permission to travel abroad. Taking account of the hardship caused by delay and the limited relief sought, it directed the trial court to decide the application within one month from production of a certified copy of the order. The requested expeditious consideration was thus accepted, and a time-bound direction was issued in favour of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 680 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419642</link>
      <description>The High Court exercised inherent jurisdiction to secure an early decision on a pending application for permission to travel abroad. Taking account of the hardship caused by delay and the limited relief sought, it directed the trial court to decide the application within one month from production of a certified copy of the order. The requested expeditious consideration was thus accepted, and a time-bound direction was issued in favour of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>