<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419626</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete deposits amounting to Rs. 1,32,72,864/- in HSBC, Geneva, in favor of the assessee. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the department failed to prove the assessee&#039;s beneficial interest in the company or the bank account, and the CIT(A) accepted the assessee&#039;s submissions supported by independent evidence. The judgment highlighted the importance of concrete evidence to establish control over funds and adherence to procedural requirements under Rule 46A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:18:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419626</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete deposits amounting to Rs. 1,32,72,864/- in HSBC, Geneva, in favor of the assessee. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the department failed to prove the assessee&#039;s beneficial interest in the company or the bank account, and the CIT(A) accepted the assessee&#039;s submissions supported by independent evidence. The judgment highlighted the importance of concrete evidence to establish control over funds and adherence to procedural requirements under Rule 46A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>