<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 662 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419624</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence to support claims for deductions and carrying forward losses. The lack of proof regarding the property&#039;s readiness for letting out led to the denial of interest deduction and the claim for carrying forward losses. The tribunal highlighted the need for clear and substantiated evidence to support claims under the law, ultimately dismissing the appeal by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:17:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 662 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419624</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence to support claims for deductions and carrying forward losses. The lack of proof regarding the property&#039;s readiness for letting out led to the denial of interest deduction and the claim for carrying forward losses. The tribunal highlighted the need for clear and substantiated evidence to support claims under the law, ultimately dismissing the appeal by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>