https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301171 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)'s decision for the assessment year 2010-11, holding that the services received by the assessee from Nalco US and Nalco Pacific were intra group services, not stewardship activities. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order based on the previous year's decision, emphasizing that the dispute solely concerned the nature of services, not the Arm's Length Price determination. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, affirming that the services in question were intra group services. en-us Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:16:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301171 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)'s decision for the assessment year 2010-11, holding that the services received by the assessee from Nalco US and Nalco Pacific were intra group services, not stewardship activities. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order based on the previous year's decision, emphasizing that the dispute solely concerned the nature of services, not the Arm's Length Price determination. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, affirming that the services in question were intra group services. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301171