<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 628 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal approved the revised resolution plan submitted by M/s. Taguda Pte Ltd., dismissing the liquidation application and directing reconsideration by stakeholders. The plan included a committed payment of INR 227 crores, with detailed timelines for creditor payments and conversion of debt into preference shares. An Interim Monitoring Agency was established to oversee plan implementation. The Tribunal granted reliefs in line with a Supreme Court judgment, ensuring compliance with mandatory resolution plan contents under Section 30(2) of the IBC. Stakeholders were bound by the approved plan, with the Resolution Professional discharged, and the Resolution Applicant tasked with supervision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 628 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal approved the revised resolution plan submitted by M/s. Taguda Pte Ltd., dismissing the liquidation application and directing reconsideration by stakeholders. The plan included a committed payment of INR 227 crores, with detailed timelines for creditor payments and conversion of debt into preference shares. An Interim Monitoring Agency was established to oversee plan implementation. The Tribunal granted reliefs in line with a Supreme Court judgment, ensuring compliance with mandatory resolution plan contents under Section 30(2) of the IBC. Stakeholders were bound by the approved plan, with the Resolution Professional discharged, and the Resolution Applicant tasked with supervision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>