https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419589 The Rajasthan HC rejected petitioners' applications for interim protection against apprehended arrest in a GST evasion case. Petitioners claimed no connection to companies allegedly involved in GST evasion, but respondents argued their presence was necessary for recording statements during ongoing investigation. The court found summons issued under Section 70 of CGST Act were within jurisdiction and authority, with no mala fide intention by respondents. Considering material disclosed during searches and raids involving the companies, interim protection was denied. The court noted this was a jurisdictional challenge, not anticipatory bail application, and scheduled final disposal within two weeks. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419589 The Rajasthan HC rejected petitioners' applications for interim protection against apprehended arrest in a GST evasion case. Petitioners claimed no connection to companies allegedly involved in GST evasion, but respondents argued their presence was necessary for recording statements during ongoing investigation. The court found summons issued under Section 70 of CGST Act were within jurisdiction and authority, with no mala fide intention by respondents. Considering material disclosed during searches and raids involving the companies, interim protection was denied. The court noted this was a jurisdictional challenge, not anticipatory bail application, and scheduled final disposal within two weeks. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419589