<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 619 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, dismissing the protective assessment made by the AO. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed due to the low tax effect, and the cross objections filed by the assessee were deemed infructuous. The Tribunal concluded that the AO and CIT(A) had relied on insufficient and unverified evidence, and there was no valid basis for the addition made under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:27:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 619 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, dismissing the protective assessment made by the AO. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed due to the low tax effect, and the cross objections filed by the assessee were deemed infructuous. The Tribunal concluded that the AO and CIT(A) had relied on insufficient and unverified evidence, and there was no valid basis for the addition made under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>