<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 617 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419579</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the disallowance of the employee&#039;s contribution towards PF and ESI, amounting to Rs. 4,26,382, due to delayed payment was not justified. The Tribunal determined that the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, were not applicable retrospectively to the assessment year 2018-19. Therefore, the disallowance was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:26:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 617 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419579</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the disallowance of the employee&#039;s contribution towards PF and ESI, amounting to Rs. 4,26,382, due to delayed payment was not justified. The Tribunal determined that the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, were not applicable retrospectively to the assessment year 2018-19. Therefore, the disallowance was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>